Waza

🥷 Engineering habits you already know, turned into skills Claude can run.

Agent Skills Python Listed MIT

Is Waza safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 8%
Last push yesterday
Compare Waza
Suggest a correction

In detail: Waza scores 78.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #20 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.2/10; 8% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Waza compares in Agent Skills

  1. #18 Dsh Agent Teams 80.5 +1.6
  2. #19 Better Harness 79.1 +0.2
  3. #20 Waza 78.9 this agent
  4. #21 Obsidian Wiki 78.9 ±0
  5. #22 Gemini Watermark Remover 77.7 −1.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Waza’s 78.9.

Where the 78.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

78.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Waza Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
13.2 / 25
5.1 above avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
6.6 above avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.1 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.0 / 20
4.8 above avg 14.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
12.9 / 20
3.9 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
82.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#20

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
7.1k
Forks
415
Last Push
2026-09-25
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
59
Downloads (7d)
574
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▲1
was #21

Analysis

Activity Inputs

82.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
22.2 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.2 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 20, 2026
Signed Commits
8%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 6
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 1
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Waza

Public supply-chain signals for Waza are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Waza carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Waza publish package provenance?
Yes. Waza's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Waza have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Waza has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Waza actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Waza use?
Waza ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Waza's commits signed?
8% of the last 100 commits to Waza are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Waza's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Waza?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Waza from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 2HVTrust 2Rank 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Grade 1Provenance 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 226 spots (#247 → #21)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 46.8pts (32.0 → 78.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #247
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#18 → #7)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.6pts (68.5 → 77.1)
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #4

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 78.9 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/waza.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/waza)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/waza"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/waza.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON