RegistryCompare › PentAGI vs PentestAgent

PentAGI vs PentestAgent

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of PentAGI and PentestAgent, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

PentAGI leads on trust — 62.5/100 (Grade C) vs 57.2/100 (Grade C), a 5.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal PentAGIvxcontrol/pentagi PentestAgentGH05TCREW/pentestagent
HVTrust score 62.5 57.2
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #184 #255
Rank in Security & Guardrails #5 #8
GitHub stars 21.6k 2.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10 6.1 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.1 9.7
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.7
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.2
Adoption / 20 10.4 8.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … 3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Tavily
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → PentAGI profile PentestAgent profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →