Registry › Compare › Open WebUI vs ToolJet

Open WebUI vs ToolJet

Open WebUI leads on trust: 85.3/100 (Grade A) against 62.7/100 (Grade C), a 22.6-point gap. Open WebUI leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

A Open WebUI 85.3

User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)

open-webui/open-webui · #80 overall · #3 UI & App Builders · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Open WebUI if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

  • +10.4Safety / Integrity: 74% of recent commits signed, against 45%
  • +8.7Adoption: 153.2k GitHub stars against 41k
  • +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
  • +0.9Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.8
C ToolJet 62.7

Open-source foundation of ToolJet AI - the enterprise app generation platform for internal tools, dashboards, business applications, workflows and AI agents. Build visually, from a prompt, or from Claude Code, Codex and Cursor over MCP 🚀

ToolJet/ToolJet · #548 overall · #11 UI & App Builders · coverage C (2/5)

ToolJet doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

18.6
Safety / IntegrityOpen WebUI +10.4
8.2
18.0
Identity / ProvenanceOpen WebUI +7.2
10.8
13.5
TransparencyOpen WebUI +0.9
12.6
20.0
MaintenanceOpen WebUI +0.1
19.9
19.8
AdoptionOpen WebUI +8.7
11.1
-4.6
Runtime calibrationToolJet +4.7
+0.1

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Open WebUI and ToolJet, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Open WebUIopen-webui/open-webui ToolJetToolJet/ToolJet
HVTrust score 85.3 62.7
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #80 #548
Rank in UI & App Builders #3 #11
GitHub stars 153.2k 41.0k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 4.8 / 10
License NOASSERTION AGPL-3.0
Downloads 315k/wk —
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.6 8.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.5 12.6
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 19.8 11.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server — Implemented
External providers 8 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, … 3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface — plugins
Provenance drift Unknown —
Open in the live compare tool → Open WebUI profile ToolJet profile More UI & App Builders →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →