Open Multi-Agent vs Ruflo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Open Multi-Agent and Ruflo, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Open Multi-Agent and Ruflo are tied on HVTrust at 64.5/100. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Open Multi-Agentopen-multi-agent/open-multi-agent | Rufloruvnet/ruflo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 64.5 | 64.5 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #221 | #220 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #6 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 6.7k | 67.4k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.3 / 10 | 5.6 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 11.5 | 7.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.0 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.2 | 11.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI | 2 — Anthropic, Supabase |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →