open-kritt vs Snyk Agent Scan
Snyk Agent Scan leads on trust: 63.6/100 (Grade C) against 57.7/100 (Grade C), a 5.9-point gap. Snyk Agent Scan leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
Open-source, self-hosted AI vulnerability research tool that orchestrates agents to find and validate security issues in code.
open-kritt doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Security scanner for AI agents, MCP servers and agent skills.
Choose Snyk Agent Scan if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +3.6Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 51%
- +0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.7 against 4.8
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of open-kritt and Snyk Agent Scan, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | open-krittKritt-ai/open-kritt | Snyk Agent Scansnyk/agent-scan |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 57.7 | 63.6 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #704 | #523 |
| Rank in Security & Guardrails | #8 | #6 |
| GitHub stars | 2.2k | 3.1k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.8 / 10 | 5.7 / 10 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 8.5 | 12.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.6 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.8 | 18.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 8.0 | 8.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →