RegistryCompare › OmniRoute vs Waza

OmniRoute vs Waza

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OmniRoute and Waza, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

OmniRoute leads on trust — 92.6/100 (Grade A) vs 77.6/100 (Grade B), a 15.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal OmniRoutediegosouzapw/OmniRoute Wazatw93/Waza
HVTrust score 92.6 77.6
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #1 #21
Rank in Agent Skills #1 #21
GitHub stars 65.7k 7.0k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10 4.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 49k/wk 222/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.6 13.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.0 12.1
Maintenance / 20 19.9 18.2
Adoption / 20 17.8 12.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → OmniRoute profile Waza profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →