RegistryCompare › OmniRoute vs Waza

OmniRoute vs Waza

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of OmniRoute and Waza, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

OmniRoute leads on trust — 93.1/100 (Grade A) vs 77.0/100 (Grade B), a 16.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal OmniRoutediegosouzapw/OmniRoute Wazatw93/Waza
HVTrust score 93.1 77.0
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #1 #7
Rank in Agent Skills #1 #7
GitHub stars 58.1k 6.9k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10 4.0 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 79k/wk 265/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.9 12.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.2 11.9
Maintenance / 20 19.9 18.1
Adoption / 20 18.0 12.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → OmniRoute profile Waza profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →