Registry › Compare › Odysseus vs ToolJet

Odysseus vs ToolJet

Odysseus leads on trust: 70.9/100 (Grade B) against 63.9/100 (Grade C), a 7.0-point gap. Odysseus leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence.

B Odysseus 70.9

Self-hosted AI workspace.

odysseus-dev/odysseus · #349 overall · #7 UI & App Builders · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Odysseus if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+5.6Safety / Integrity: 96% of recent commits signed, against 55%
+2.4Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.9 against 5.1
+0.8Adoption: 95.2k GitHub stars against 41.2k
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

C ToolJet 63.9

Open-source foundation of ToolJet AI - the enterprise app generation platform for internal tools, dashboards, business applications, workflows and AI agents. Build visually, from a prompt, or from Claude Code, Codex and Cursor over MCP 🚀

ToolJet/ToolJet · #567 overall · #9 UI & App Builders · coverage C (2/5)

ToolJet doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

14.7

Safety / IntegrityOdysseus +5.6

9.1

15.2

TransparencyOdysseus +2.4

12.8

19.9

MaintenanceToolJet +0.1

20.0

11.9

AdoptionOdysseus +0.8

11.1

-1.6

Runtime calibrationToolJet +1.7

+0.1

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Odysseus and ToolJet, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Odysseusodysseus-dev/odysseus	ToolJetToolJet/ToolJet
HVTrust score	70.9	63.9
Evidence grade	B	C
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#349	#567
Rank in UI & App Builders	#7	#9
GitHub stars	95.2k	41.2k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	7.9 / 10	5.1 / 10
License	AGPL-3.0	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	14.7	9.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	15.2	12.8
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	11.9	11.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	1 — Postgres	3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Odysseus profile ToolJet profile More UI & App Builders →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →