RegistryCompare › Obsidian Wiki vs Open Code Review

Obsidian Wiki vs Open Code Review

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Obsidian Wiki and Open Code Review, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Open Code Review leads on trust — 46.3/100 (Grade D) vs 45.5/100 (Grade D), a 0.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Obsidian WikiAr9av/obsidian-wiki Open Code Reviewalibaba/open-code-review
HVTrust score 45.5 46.3
Evidence grade D D
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #8 #7
Rank in Agent Skills #8 #7
GitHub stars 3.2k 20.2k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 65k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.0 4.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 8.5 8.5
Maintenance / 20 18.2 20.0
Adoption / 20 8.4 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Obsidian Wiki profile Open Code Review profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →