RegistryCompare › Modlens vs Open Code Review

Modlens vs Open Code Review

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Modlens and Open Code Review, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Modlens leads on trust — 83.0/100 (Grade A) vs 82.9/100 (Grade A), a 0.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Modlensliustack/modlens Open Code Reviewalibaba/open-code-review
HVTrust score 83.0 82.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #1 #2
Rank in Agent Skills #1 #2
GitHub stars 3.8k 21.8k
Last updated 2d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 7.7 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 41k/wk 77k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.6 14.6
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.7 15.0
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 14.8 16.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Modlens profile Open Code Review profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →