Registry › Compare › MCP Inspector vs MCP TypeScript SDK

MCP Inspector vs MCP TypeScript SDK

Both are Grade A and 3.2 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. MCP Inspector leads on maintenance; MCP TypeScript SDK leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A MCP Inspector 91.4

Visual testing tool for MCP servers

modelcontextprotocol/inspector · #15 overall · #3 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose MCP Inspector if maintenance matters most.

+1.2Maintenance

A MCP TypeScript SDK 94.6

The official TypeScript SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clients

modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk · #3 overall · #1 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose MCP TypeScript SDK if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+3.2Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 31%
+2.7Adoption: 76.2M weekly downloads against 496.5k

Where they differ

17.9

Safety / IntegrityMCP TypeScript SDK +3.2

21.1

14.5

TransparencyMCP Inspector +0.1

14.4

20.0

MaintenanceMCP Inspector +1.2

18.8

17.3

AdoptionMCP TypeScript SDK +2.7

20.0

+3.7

Runtime calibrationMCP Inspector +1.4

+2.3

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of MCP Inspector and MCP TypeScript SDK, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector	MCP TypeScript SDKmodelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk
HVTrust score	91.4	94.6
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#15	#3
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#3	#1
GitHub stars	11.0k	13.5k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.1 / 10	6.9 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	NOASSERTION
Downloads	496k/wk	76.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.9	21.1
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.5	14.4
Maintenance / 20	20.0	18.8
Adoption / 20	17.3	20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → MCP Inspector profile MCP TypeScript SDK profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →