Registry › Compare › MaiBot vs TEN Framework

MaiBot vs TEN Framework

Both are Grade C and 1.9 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. MaiBot leads on maintenance; TEN Framework leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

C MaiBot 56.1

MaiSaka, an LLM-based intelligent agent, is a digital lifeform devoted to understanding you and interacting in the style of a real human. She does not pursue perfection, nor does she seek efficiency; instead, she values warmth, authenticity, and genuine connection.

Mai-with-u/MaiBot · #794 overall · #10 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

Choose MaiBot if maintenance matters most.

+2.7Maintenance

C TEN Framework 58.0

Open-source framework for conversational voice AI agents

TEN-framework/ten-framework · #729 overall · #9 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

Choose TEN Framework if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.6Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 6%
+0.6Adoption: 11.2k GitHub stars against 6.2k

Where they differ

5.4

Safety / IntegrityTEN Framework +4.6

10.0

12.0

TransparencyMaiBot +0.1

11.9

19.9

MaintenanceMaiBot +2.7

17.2

9.1

AdoptionTEN Framework +0.6

9.7

-1.1

Runtime calibrationMaiBot +0.5

-1.6

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of MaiBot and TEN Framework, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	MaiBotMai-with-u/MaiBot	TEN FrameworkTEN-framework/ten-framework
HVTrust score	56.1	58.0
Evidence grade	C	C
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#794	#729
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#10	#9
GitHub stars	6.2k	11.2k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.1 / 10	4.0 / 10
License	GPL-3.0	NOASSERTION
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	5.4	10.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.0	11.9
Maintenance / 20	19.9	17.2
Adoption / 20	9.1	9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	—
External providers	2 — Google Gemini, OpenAI	1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	extensions
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → MaiBot profile TEN Framework profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →