RegistryCompare › MaiBot vs TEN Framework

MaiBot vs TEN Framework

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of MaiBot and TEN Framework, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

TEN Framework leads on trust — 59.6/100 (Grade C) vs 55.9/100 (Grade C), a 3.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal MaiBotMai-with-u/MaiBot TEN FrameworkTEN-framework/ten-framework
HVTrust score 55.9 59.6
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #731 #621
Rank in Voice & Conversational #7 #6
GitHub stars 5.9k 11.1k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10 5.0 / 10
License GPL-3.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 5.3 11.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 11.8 12.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.7
Adoption / 20 9.1 9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 2 — Google Gemini, OpenAI 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → MaiBot profile TEN Framework profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →