RegistryCompare › LiveKit Agents vs TEN Framework

LiveKit Agents vs TEN Framework

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LiveKit Agents and TEN Framework, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LiveKit Agents leads on trust — 91.8/100 (Grade A) vs 61.3/100 (Grade C), a 30.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal LiveKit Agentslivekit/agents TEN FrameworkTEN-framework/ten-framework
HVTrust score 91.8 61.3
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #5 #291
Rank in Voice & Conversational #1 #4
GitHub stars 12.7k 11.0k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10 5.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 936k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.4 11.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.9 12.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.4
Adoption / 20 17.8 9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → LiveKit Agents profile TEN Framework profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →