Larksuite Cli vs Open Code Review
Open Code Review leads on trust: 94.7/100 (Grade A) against 89.0/100 (Grade A), a 5.7-point gap. Open Code Review leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance.
The official Lark/飞书 CLI tool, maintained by the larksuite team — built for humans and AI Agents. Covers core business domains including Messenger, Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar, Mail, Tasks, Meetings, and more, with 200+ commands and 20+ AI Agent Skills.
Larksuite Cli doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Secure, fast, efficient, battle-tested at Alibaba's scale. Hybrid architecture code review tool: deterministic pipelines + LLM Agent, precise line-level comments, built-in multi-language ruleset (NPE, thread-safety, XSS, SQL injection), OpenAI & Anthropic compatible.
Choose Open Code Review if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.
- +2.2Maintenance
- +1.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 6.0
- +1.3Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 6.0
- +1.1Adoption: 121.5k weekly downloads against 110k
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Larksuite Cli and Open Code Review, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli | Open Code Reviewalibaba/open-code-review |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.0 | 94.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #5 | #1 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #5 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 17.7k | 46.8k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.0 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 110k/wk | 121k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.0 | 21.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.6 | 14.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.8 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.9 | 18.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →