RegistryCompare › Larksuite Cli vs Open Code Review

Larksuite Cli vs Open Code Review

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Larksuite Cli and Open Code Review, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Larksuite Cli leads on trust — 89.8/100 (Grade A) vs 82.5/100 (Grade A), a 7.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli Open Code Reviewalibaba/open-code-review
HVTrust score 89.8 82.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #3 #11
Rank in Agent Skills #3 #11
GitHub stars 17.2k 23.3k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 7.4 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 75k/wk 93k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.4 14.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.2 14.8
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 16.7 17.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Larksuite Cli profile Open Code Review profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →