LangWatch vs OpenLLMetry
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LangWatch and OpenLLMetry, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
OpenLLMetry leads on trust — 83.2/100 (Grade A) vs 75.7/100 (Grade B), a 7.5-point gap. Note: OpenLLMetry's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | LangWatchlangwatch/langwatch | OpenLLMetrytraceloop/openllmetry |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 75.7 | 83.2 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #83 | #58 |
| Rank in Observability & Evaluation | #6 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 3.5k | 7.4k |
| Last updated | today | 4d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | — | 6.7 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 88k/wk | 527k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 11.9 | 19.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 8.5 | 14.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 11.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.1 | 16.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 2 — Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI | 9 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Partial | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
LangWatch profile
OpenLLMetry profile
More Observability & Evaluation →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →