Registry › Compare › LangWatch vs Latitude

LangWatch vs Latitude

LangWatch leads on trust: 83.0/100 (Grade A) against 76.9/100 (Grade B), a 6.1-point gap. LangWatch leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence.

A LangWatch 83.0

Open-Source Agent Observability & Evals for AI Platform teams. Trace, test, route and govern every agent & coding assistant in the company.

langwatch/langwatch · #111 overall · #5 Observability & Evaluation · coverage A (4/5)

Choose LangWatch if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+5.8Safety / Integrity
+4.2Transparency
+1.7Adoption: 88.7k weekly downloads against 5.4k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

B Latitude 76.9

Open-source observability for AI agents. Find where your agents fail, dispatch your coding agent to fix it, and verify the fix against real traces.

latitude-dev/latitude-llm · #210 overall · #8 Observability & Evaluation · coverage B (3/5)

Latitude doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

17.8

Safety / IntegrityLangWatch +5.8

12.0

12.7

TransparencyLangWatch +4.2

8.5

15.5

AdoptionLangWatch +1.7

13.8

-0.9

Runtime calibrationLatitude +5.6

+4.7

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LangWatch and Latitude, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	LangWatchlangwatch/langwatch	Latitudelatitude-dev/latitude-llm
HVTrust score	83.0	76.9
Evidence grade	A	B
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#111	#210
Rank in Observability & Evaluation	#5	#8
GitHub stars	4.9k	4.7k
Last updated	1d ago	2d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.9 / 10	—
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	89k/wk	5k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.8	12.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.7	8.5
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.9
Adoption / 20	15.5	13.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, ElevenLabs, …	—
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Partial	Match

Open in the live compare tool → LangWatch profile Latitude profile More Observability & Evaluation →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →