RegistryCompare › LangGraph vs Strands Agents

LangGraph vs Strands Agents

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LangGraph and Strands Agents, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LangGraph leads on trust — 92.8/100 (Grade A) vs 91.4/100 (Grade A), a 1.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal LangGraphlangchain-ai/langgraph Strands Agentsstrands-agents/harness-sdk
HVTrust score 92.8 91.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade A B
Overall rank #4 #7
Rank in Agent Frameworks #3 #4
GitHub stars 39.7k 6.9k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 5.4 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 17.5M/wk 7.8M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.2 19.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.4 13.1
Maintenance / 20 18.4 19.9
Adoption / 20 20.0 18.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Partial Match
Open in the live compare tool → LangGraph profile Strands Agents profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →