LangGraph vs OpenAI Agents SDK
Both are Grade A and 3.0 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. LangGraph leads on adoption; OpenAI Agents SDK leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
Build resilient agents.
Choose LangGraph if adoption matters most.
- +0.6Adoption: 15.9M weekly downloads against 3.2M
A lightweight, powerful framework for multi-agent workflows
Choose OpenAI Agents SDK if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +1.0Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.9 against 7.1
- +0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.9 against 7.1
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LangGraph and OpenAI Agents SDK, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | LangGraphlangchain-ai/langgraph | OpenAI Agents SDKopenai/openai-agents-python |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 94.5 | 91.5 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #3 | #14 |
| Rank in Agent Frameworks | #2 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 43.4k | 30.1k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.1 / 10 | 7.9 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 15.9M/wk | 3.2M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 21.4 | 22.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.5 | 15.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 19.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | — | 6 — Amazon Bedrock, E2B, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), … |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Partial | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →