Registry › Compare › Langflow vs Nocobase

Langflow vs Nocobase

Langflow leads on trust: 79.3/100 (Grade B) against 66.2/100 (Grade B), a 13.1-point gap. Langflow leads on adoption and supply-chain integrity, and rests on broader evidence.

B Langflow 79.3

Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.

langflow-ai/langflow · #159 overall · #5 Workflow Platforms · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Langflow if adoption and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+5.4Adoption: 8.6k weekly downloads against 21
+3.1Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 73%
+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.7 against 4.3
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

B Nocobase 66.2

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything from scratch, AI works on top of production-proven infrastructure and a WYSIWYG no-code interface, so you get both speed and reliability.

nocobase/nocobase · #436 overall · #10 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Nocobase doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

12.1

Safety / IntegrityLangflow +3.1

9.0

13.3

TransparencyLangflow +1.1

12.2

20.0

MaintenanceLangflow +0.3

19.7

17.7

AdoptionLangflow +5.4

12.3

+5.4

Runtime calibrationLangflow +3.2

+2.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Langflow and Nocobase, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Langflowlangflow-ai/langflow	Nocobasenocobase/nocobase
HVTrust score	79.3	66.2
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#159	#436
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#5	#10
GitHub stars	155.5k	24.4k
Last updated	today	3d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.7 / 10	4.3 / 10
License	MIT	NOASSERTION
Downloads	9k/wk	21/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.1	9.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.3	12.2
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.7
Adoption / 20	17.7	12.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	1 — Postgres	4 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Langflow profile Nocobase profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →