RegistryCompare › LanceDB vs Weaviate

LanceDB vs Weaviate

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LanceDB and Weaviate, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LanceDB leads on trust — 87.1/100 (Grade A) vs 75.0/100 (Grade B), a 12.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal LanceDBlancedb/lancedb Weaviateweaviate/weaviate
HVTrust score 87.1 75.0
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #28 #91
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #1 #8
GitHub stars 11.1k 16.7k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10 6.7 / 10
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Downloads 1.6M/wk 49.6M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.6 10.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.8 14.2
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.0 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, … 1 — Weaviate
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Unknown Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → LanceDB profile Weaviate profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →