Kubernetes MCP Server vs Notion MCP Server
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Kubernetes MCP Server and Notion MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Kubernetes MCP Server leads on trust — 80.3/100 (Grade A) vs 78.0/100 (Grade B), a 2.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Kubernetes MCP ServerFlux159/mcp-server-kubernetes | Notion MCP Servermakenotion/notion-mcp-server |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 80.3 | 78.0 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #136 | #172 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #65 | #92 |
| GitHub stars | 1.6k | 4.6k |
| Last updated | 4d ago | 5d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.5 / 10 | 4.3 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 4k/wk | 123k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 16.9 | 15.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.2 | 12.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 13.7 | 11.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 12.5 | 15.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Google Gemini | — |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
Kubernetes MCP Server profile
Notion MCP Server profile
More MCP Servers →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →