Notion MCP Server
Official Notion MCP Server
Is Notion MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Compare Notion MCP Server
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Notion MCP Server scores 80.2/100 (Grade A), ranked #155 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 52% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@notionhq/notion-mcp-server); last pushed 2026-09-20. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Notion MCP Server could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 4.5 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Dependency-Update-Tool 0, Fuzzing 0 +8.0 → 88.2 A · #8 of 781
- Sign every commit52% signed today +2.4 → 82.6 A · #44 of 781
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Notion MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/makenotion/notion-mcp-server, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-20. 52% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.5/10 (scanned Oct 3, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review6
- Branch Protection6
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies6
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 6CI-Tests 9CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 6Contributors 3Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 5Packaging 10Pinned-Dependencies 6SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages Linked and attested
- npm @notionhq/notion-mcp-server Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested
-
What you install today No known advisories
Latest release checked: @notionhq/notion-mcp-server 2.5.2. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-11).
Changes to this chain
No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of Notion MCP Server.
Evidence behind this score
Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Notion MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How Notion MCP Server compares in MCP Servers
- #72 Enquire MCP 80.2 ±0
- #73 Mdk MCP Server 80.2 ±0
- #74 Notion MCP Server 80.2 this agent
- #75 Qase Test Management 80.1 −0.1
- #76 Better Notion MCP 80.1 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Notion MCP Server’s 80.2.
Where the 80.2 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
80.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceNotion MCP Server MCP Servers average (781 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
65.9 / 100Common questions about Notion MCP Server
Does Notion MCP Server publish package provenance?
Does Notion MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Notion MCP Server actively maintained?
What license does Notion MCP Server use?
Are Notion MCP Server's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain Notion MCP Server?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Notion MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/notion-mcp-server)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/notion-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/notion-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON