Registry › Compare › KiCad MCP Pro vs Mobile MCP

KiCad MCP Pro vs Mobile MCP

Both are Grade A and 3.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. KiCad MCP Pro leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance; Mobile MCP leads on adoption.

A KiCad MCP Pro 88.9

MCP server for KiCad, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, ERC/DRC validation, DFM checks, BOM analysis, and manufacturing preparation—with controlled edits and human-gated release workflows.

oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro · #34 overall · #7 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose KiCad MCP Pro if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+1.3Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago
+1.1Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 8.5 against 7.6
+0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 8.5 against 7.6

A Mobile MCP 92.3

Model Context Protocol Server for Mobile Automation and Scraping (iOS, Android, Emulators, Simulators and Real Devices)

mobile-next/mobile-mcp · #9 overall · #1 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Mobile MCP if adoption matters most.

+5.7Adoption: 49.1k weekly downloads against 5.7k

Where they differ

23.1

Safety / IntegrityKiCad MCP Pro +1.1

22.0

15.7

TransparencyKiCad MCP Pro +0.7

15.0

20.0

MaintenanceKiCad MCP Pro +1.3

18.7

10.0

AdoptionMobile MCP +5.7

15.7

+2.1

Runtime calibrationMobile MCP +0.8

+2.9

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of KiCad MCP Pro and Mobile MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	KiCad MCP Prooaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro	Mobile MCPmobile-next/mobile-mcp
HVTrust score	88.9	92.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#34	#9
Rank in MCP Servers	#7	#1
GitHub stars	123	9.0k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	8.5 / 10	7.6 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	6k/wk	49k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	23.1	22.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	15.7	15.0
Maintenance / 20	20.0	18.7
Adoption / 20	10.0	15.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → KiCad MCP Pro profile Mobile MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →