Registry › Compare › Hypit vs Nocobase

Hypit vs Nocobase

Hypit leads on trust: 80.4/100 (Grade A) against 68.1/100 (Grade B), a 12.3-point gap. Hypit leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance; Nocobase leads on maintenance.

A Hypit 80.4

Clone any viral video with AI agents. Not just a script, the whole workflow: swap the face, the words, the B-roll, ship 100 variants in one command, and get your 100M views.

hypit-ai/hypit · #177 overall · #4 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Hypit if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+4.0Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 4.2 against 3.8
+4.0Adoption: 14.3k weekly downloads against 16

B Nocobase 68.1

NocoBase is the open-source platform for building, running, and evolving business systems with AI. Agents write the code and do the work, NocoBase provides the foundation and governance, and people make the decisions.

nocobase/nocobase · #422 overall · #8 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Nocobase if maintenance matters most.

+3.6Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

Where they differ

13.7

Safety / IntegrityHypit +4.0

9.7

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceHypit +7.2

10.8

12.1

TransparencyHypit +0.4

11.7

16.4

MaintenanceNocobase +3.6

20.0

16.2

AdoptionHypit +4.0

12.2

+4.0

Runtime calibrationHypit +0.3

+3.7

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hypit and Nocobase, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Hypithypit-ai/hypit	Nocobasenocobase/nocobase
HVTrust score	80.4	68.1
Evidence grade	A	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#177	#422
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#4	#8
GitHub stars	28.9k	24.9k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.2 / 10	3.8 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	NOASSERTION
Downloads	14k/wk	16/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.7	9.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.1	11.7
Maintenance / 20	16.4	20.0
Adoption / 20	16.2	12.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Declared
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Hypit profile Nocobase profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →