Registry › Compare › Hindsight vs zvec-grep

Hindsight vs zvec-grep

Both are Grade A and 1.0 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Hindsight leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; zvec-grep leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency. Note: zvec-grep's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

A Hindsight 86.4

Hindsight: Agent Memory That Learns

vectorize-io/hindsight · #81 overall · #8 Memory & Knowledge · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Hindsight if adoption matters most.

  • +3.7Adoption: 19.6k weekly downloads against 3.6k
  • A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
A zvec-grep 87.4

Local-first search across your workspace, built for humans and AI agents.

zvec-ai/zvec-grep · #70 overall · #6 Memory & Knowledge · coverage B (3/5)

Choose zvec-grep if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

  • +1.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 98%
  • +0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.6 against 4.9

Where they differ

18.5
Safety / Integrityzvec-grep +1.0
19.5
12.7
Transparencyzvec-grep +0.6
13.3
19.9
Maintenancezvec-grep +0.1
20.0
17.2
AdoptionHindsight +3.7
13.5
+0.1
Runtime calibrationzvec-grep +3.0
+3.1

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hindsight and zvec-grep, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Hindsightvectorize-io/hindsight zvec-grepzvec-ai/zvec-grep
HVTrust score 86.4 87.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade A B
Overall rank #81 #70
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #8 #6
GitHub stars 58.1k 4.2k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 5.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 20k/wk 4k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.5 19.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.7 13.3
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 17.2 13.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI 1 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins —
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Hindsight profile zvec-grep profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →