GPT Researcher vs OpenScience
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of GPT Researcher and OpenScience, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
OpenScience leads on trust — 78.7/100 (Grade B) vs 61.9/100 (Grade C), a 16.8-point gap. Note: OpenScience's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | GPT Researcherassafelovic/gpt-researcher | OpenSciencesynthetic-sciences/openscience |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 61.9 | 78.7 |
| Evidence grade | C | B |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #279 | #69 |
| Rank in Research & Data | #8 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 29.1k | 3.3k |
| Last updated | 36d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.2 / 10 | 4.7 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 18k/wk | 3k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 9.2 | 15.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.8 | 12.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 9.6 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.4 | 13.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 5 — Firecrawl, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), … | 7 — Anthropic, Cohere, Google Gemini, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →