Registry › Compare › Flyte vs Hatchet

Flyte vs Hatchet

Both are Grade B and 4.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Flyte leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; Hatchet leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

B Flyte 71.7

Type-safe, distributed orchestration of agents, ML pipelines, and real-time inference on your k8s — in pure Python with async/await, also other languages (rust, go and ts)

flyteorg/flyte · #320 overall · #7 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Flyte if adoption matters most.

+6.7Adoption
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

B Hatchet 67.2

🪓 An orchestration engine for background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows

hatchet-dev/hatchet · #437 overall · #8 Workflow Platforms · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Hatchet if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+0.5Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.8
+0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.8

Where they differ

12.2

Safety / IntegrityHatchet +0.5

12.7

13.4

TransparencyHatchet +0.5

13.9

19.5

MaintenanceHatchet +0.4

19.9

16.1

AdoptionFlyte +6.7

9.4

-0.3

Runtime calibrationHatchet +0.8

+0.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and Hatchet, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Flyteflyteorg/flyte	Hatchethatchet-dev/hatchet
HVTrust score	71.7	67.2
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#320	#437
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#7	#8
GitHub stars	7.7k	8.1k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.8 / 10	6.3 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	115k/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.2	12.7
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.4	13.9
Maintenance / 20	19.5	19.9
Adoption / 20	16.1	9.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	—	4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Unknown	—

Open in the live compare tool → Flyte profile Hatchet profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →