Flyte vs Hatchet
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and Hatchet, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Flyte leads on trust — 72.3/100 (Grade B) vs 65.4/100 (Grade B), a 6.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Flyteflyteorg/flyte | Hatchethatchet-dev/hatchet |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 72.3 | 65.4 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | B | C |
| Overall rank | #138 | #246 |
| Rank in Workflow Platforms | #5 | #9 |
| GitHub stars | 7.3k | 7.8k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.9 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 98k/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.4 | 12.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.5 | 13.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.9 | 9.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | — | 4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, … |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →