RegistryCompare › Firecrawl vs GPT Researcher

Firecrawl vs GPT Researcher

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Firecrawl and GPT Researcher, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Firecrawl leads on trust — 74.7/100 (Grade B) vs 70.4/100 (Grade B), a 4.3-point gap. Note: Firecrawl's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal Firecrawlfirecrawl/firecrawl GPT Researcherassafelovic/gpt-researcher
HVTrust score 74.7 70.4
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #78 #103
Rank in Research & Data #4 #5
GitHub stars 161.0k 28.8k
Last updated today 17d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 6.2 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 2.2M/wk 18k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.6 9.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.5 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.1
Adoption / 20 20.0 16.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 5 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, OpenAI, … 5 — Firecrawl, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Firecrawl profile GPT Researcher profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →