ffmpeg-skill vs Open Code Review
Both are Grade A and 4.2 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. ffmpeg-skill leads on maintenance; Open Code Review leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.
Local video editor for coding agents: 42 FFmpeg tools with a machine-readable contract and an MCP server, for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. Cut, captions, reframe, loudness, platform exports. No cloud, no API keys.
Choose ffmpeg-skill if maintenance matters most.
- +0.9Maintenance
Secure, fast, efficient, battle-tested at Alibaba's scale. Hybrid architecture code review tool: deterministic pipelines + LLM Agent, precise line-level comments, built-in multi-language ruleset (NPE, thread-safety, XSS, SQL injection), OpenAI & Anthropic compatible.
Choose Open Code Review if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +4.0Adoption: 174.2k weekly downloads against 9.5k
- +2.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 55%
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Transparency 14.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ffmpeg-skill and Open Code Review, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | ffmpeg-skillkajisho5/ffmpeg-skill | Open Code Reviewalibaba/open-code-review |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 90.0 | 94.2 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #4 | #1 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #4 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 5.6k | 51.5k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.5 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 9k/wk | 174k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.6 | 21.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.9 | 14.9 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.1 |
| Adoption / 20 | 14.3 | 18.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →