RegistryCompare › FAISS vs Hindsight

FAISS vs Hindsight

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FAISS and Hindsight, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Hindsight leads on trust — 81.4/100 (Grade A) vs 75.3/100 (Grade B), a 6.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FAISSfacebookresearch/faiss Hindsightvectorize-io/hindsight
HVTrust score 75.3 81.4
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #77 #56
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #8 #6
GitHub stars 40.7k 19.1k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 4.9 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 3.9M/wk 17k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 7.6 18.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.7 12.7
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 19.8 15.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → FAISS profile Hindsight profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →