Registry › Compare › Dyad vs Open WebUI

Dyad vs Open WebUI

Open WebUI leads on trust: 84.5/100 (Grade A) against 63.1/100 (Grade C), a 21.4-point gap. Open WebUI leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

C Dyad 63.1

Local, open-source AI app builder for power users ✨ v0 / Lovable / Replit / Bolt alternative 🌟 Star if you like it!

dyad-sh/dyad · #594 overall · #12 UI & App Builders · coverage C (2/5)

Dyad doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Open WebUI 84.5

User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)

open-webui/open-webui · #103 overall · #3 UI & App Builders · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Open WebUI if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+9.0Adoption: 157.6k GitHub stars against 22.2k
+7.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.4
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+1.3Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.4

Where they differ

10.5

Safety / IntegrityOpen WebUI +7.7

18.2

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceOpen WebUI +7.2

18.0

12.2

TransparencyOpen WebUI +1.3

13.5

19.8

MaintenanceOpen WebUI +0.2

20.0

10.4

AdoptionOpen WebUI +9.0

19.4

-0.6

Runtime calibrationDyad +4.0

-4.6

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Dyad and Open WebUI, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Dyaddyad-sh/dyad	Open WebUIopen-webui/open-webui
HVTrust score	63.1	84.5
Evidence grade	C	A
Coverage grade	C	A
Overall rank	#594	#103
Rank in UI & App Builders	#12	#3
GitHub stars	22.2k	157.6k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.4 / 10	5.9 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	NOASSERTION
Downloads	—	159k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.5	18.2
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.2	13.5
Maintenance / 20	19.8	20.0
Adoption / 20	10.4	19.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	5 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres, …	8 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Dyad profile Open WebUI profile More UI & App Builders →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →