Dyad vs Odysseus
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Dyad and Odysseus, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Odysseus leads on trust — 63.1/100 (Grade C) vs 61.4/100 (Grade C), a 1.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Dyaddyad-sh/dyad | Odysseuspewdiepie-archdaemon/odysseus |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 61.4 | 63.1 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #202 | #178 |
| Rank in UI & App Builders | #8 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 21.1k | 84.7k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 3.9 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | AGPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 11.8 | 14.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 10.4 | 11.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, … | 1 — Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →