Dyad vs Odysseus
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Dyad and Odysseus, two UI & App Builders projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Odysseus leads on trust — 66.8/100 (Grade B) vs 62.8/100 (Grade C), a 4.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Dyaddyad-sh/dyad | Odysseuspewdiepie-archdaemon/odysseus |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 62.8 | 66.8 |
| Evidence grade | C | B |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #533 | #402 |
| Rank in UI & App Builders | #10 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 21.6k | 87.4k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | 3d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.2 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | AGPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.2 | 13.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.1 | 15.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 16.8 |
| Adoption / 20 | 10.4 | 11.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 5 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres, … | 1 — Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →