RegistryCompare › DSH Better Sidebar vs Waza

DSH Better Sidebar vs Waza

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DSH Better Sidebar and Waza, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

DSH Better Sidebar leads on trust — 83.0/100 (Grade A) vs 77.6/100 (Grade B), a 5.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal DSH Better Sidebaromdsh-dev/DSH-better-sidebar Wazatw93/Waza
HVTrust score 83.0 77.6
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #10 #21
Rank in Agent Skills #10 #21
GitHub stars 3.6k 7.0k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10 4.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 67k/wk 222/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.8 13.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.2 12.1
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.2
Adoption / 20 15.0 12.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — DeepSeek
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → DSH Better Sidebar profile Waza profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →