RegistryCompare › Codebase Memory MCP vs Notion MCP Server

Codebase Memory MCP vs Notion MCP Server

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Codebase Memory MCP and Notion MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 93.6/100 (Grade A) vs 50.2/100 (Grade C), a 43.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp Notion MCP Servermakenotion/notion-mcp-server
HVTrust score 93.6 50.2
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #3 #325
Rank in MCP Servers #1 #31
GitHub stars 43.9k 4.6k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 8.6 / 10 4.3 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 16k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 20.4 15.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.8 12.2
Maintenance / 20 20.0 13.3
Adoption / 20 16.7 8.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Codebase Memory MCP profile Notion MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →