RegistryCompare › CloakBrowser MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

CloakBrowser MCP vs XcodeBuildMCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CloakBrowser MCP and XcodeBuildMCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

CloakBrowser MCP leads on trust — 82.5/100 (Grade A) vs 81.0/100 (Grade A), a 1.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal CloakBrowser MCPswimmwatch/cloakbrowser-mcp XcodeBuildMCPgetsentry/XcodeBuildMCP
HVTrust score 82.5 81.0
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #105 #123
Rank in MCP Servers #41 #56
GitHub stars 58 6.4k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10 5.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 595/wk 51k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.1 16.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.6 12.9
Maintenance / 20 17.1 11.9
Adoption / 20 8.0 15.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → CloakBrowser MCP profile XcodeBuildMCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →