CloakBrowser MCP vs Kubernetes MCP Server
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CloakBrowser MCP and Kubernetes MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Kubernetes MCP Server leads on trust — 85.0/100 (Grade A) vs 81.7/100 (Grade A), a 3.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | CloakBrowser MCPswimmwatch/cloakbrowser-mcp | Kubernetes MCP ServerFlux159/mcp-server-kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 81.7 | 85.0 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #66 | #49 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #8 | #6 |
| GitHub stars | 37 | 1.5k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | 4d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.9 / 10 | 5.5 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 405/wk | 15k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.3 | 16.3 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.4 | 13.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.0 | 18.3 |
| Adoption / 20 | 7.3 | 13.2 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 1 — Google Gemini |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
CloakBrowser MCP profile
Kubernetes MCP Server profile
More MCP Servers →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →