RegistryCompare › CloakBrowser MCP vs Codebase Memory MCP

CloakBrowser MCP vs Codebase Memory MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CloakBrowser MCP and Codebase Memory MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 91.2/100 (Grade A) vs 81.7/100 (Grade A), a 9.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal CloakBrowser MCPswimmwatch/cloakbrowser-mcp Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp
HVTrust score 81.7 91.2
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #66 #8
Rank in MCP Servers #8 #1
GitHub stars 37 38.6k
Last updated 2d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10 7.6 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 405/wk 5k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.3 18.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.4 15.0
Maintenance / 20 17.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 7.3 15.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → CloakBrowser MCP profile Codebase Memory MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →