RegistryCompare › CLI-Anything vs MCP Inspector

CLI-Anything vs MCP Inspector

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of CLI-Anything and MCP Inspector, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

MCP Inspector leads on trust — 89.9/100 (Grade A) vs 80.0/100 (Grade A), a 9.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal CLI-AnythingHKUDS/CLI-Anything MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector
HVTrust score 80.0 89.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #70 #12
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #5 #1
GitHub stars 47.1k 10.7k
Last updated 1d ago 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10 6.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 2k/wk 185k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 14.1 18.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 11.8 13.7
Maintenance / 20 16.7 19.9
Adoption / 20 15.7 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → CLI-Anything profile MCP Inspector profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →