RegistryCompare › Chrome DevTools MCP vs MCP Inspector

Chrome DevTools MCP vs MCP Inspector

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Chrome DevTools MCP and MCP Inspector, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

MCP Inspector leads on trust — 90.0/100 (Grade A) vs 73.0/100 (Grade B), a 17.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Chrome DevTools MCPChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector
HVTrust score 73.0 90.0
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #103 #12
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #8 #1
GitHub stars 48.7k 10.6k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 8.0 / 10 6.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 185k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.0 18.8
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.3 13.8
Maintenance / 20 19.7 19.9
Adoption / 20 11.3 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Chrome DevTools MCP profile MCP Inspector profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →