RegistryCompare › Chrome DevTools MCP vs MCP Inspector

Chrome DevTools MCP vs MCP Inspector

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Chrome DevTools MCP and MCP Inspector, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

MCP Inspector leads on trust — 82.7/100 (Grade A) vs 73.9/100 (Grade B), a 8.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Chrome DevTools MCPChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector
HVTrust score 73.9 82.7
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #95 #64
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #8 #4
GitHub stars 52.4k 10.9k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 8.3 / 10 6.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0
Downloads 227k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.4 16.6
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 15.6 5.4
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 11.3 16.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Chrome DevTools MCP profile MCP Inspector profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →