RegistryCompare › Chroma vs LightRAG

Chroma vs LightRAG

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Chroma and LightRAG, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LightRAG leads on trust — 85.0/100 (Grade A) vs 73.1/100 (Grade B), a 11.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Chromachroma-core/chroma LightRAGHKUDS/LightRAG
HVTrust score 73.1 85.0
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #101 #50
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #16 #7
GitHub stars 29.3k 39.8k
Last updated 3d ago today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10 5.9 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 1.4M/wk 31k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.5 17.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.2 13.5
Maintenance / 20 17.7 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.9 17.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 3 — Cohere, Google Gemini, OpenAI 6 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Chroma profile LightRAG profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →