Registry › Compare › BrowserOS vs OpenClaw

BrowserOS vs OpenClaw

OpenClaw leads on trust: 91.1/100 (Grade A) against 66.0/100 (Grade B), a 25.1-point gap. OpenClaw leads on adoption and supply-chain integrity, and rests on broader evidence.

B BrowserOS 66.0

🌐 The open-source Agentic browser; alternative to ChatGPT Atlas, Perplexity Comet, Dia.

browseros-ai/BrowserOS · #442 overall · #14 Browser & Computer Use · coverage C (2/5)

BrowserOS doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A OpenClaw 91.1

The AI that really does things. Any OS. Any Platform. The lobster way. 🦞

openclaw/openclaw · #13 overall · #1 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose OpenClaw if adoption and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+10.1Adoption: 390.5k GitHub stars against 13.8k
+8.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.9
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.9

Where they differ

11.0

Safety / IntegrityOpenClaw +8.7

19.7

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceOpenClaw +7.2

18.0

12.7

TransparencyOpenClaw +0.8

13.5

19.9

MaintenanceOpenClaw +0.1

20.0

9.9

AdoptionOpenClaw +10.1

20.0

+1.7

Runtime calibrationBrowserOS +1.8

-0.1

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of BrowserOS and OpenClaw, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	BrowserOSbrowseros-ai/BrowserOS	OpenClawopenclaw/openclaw
HVTrust score	66.0	91.1
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	C	A
Overall rank	#442	#13
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#14	#1
GitHub stars	13.8k	390.5k
Last updated	2d ago	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.9 / 10	5.9 / 10
License	AGPL-3.0	NOASSERTION
Downloads	—	2.8M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.0	19.7
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.7	13.5
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	9.9	20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Amazon Bedrock	4 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Mistral AI, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	extensions
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → BrowserOS profile OpenClaw profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →