RegistryCompare › BrowserGym agents vs Cua

BrowserGym agents vs Cua

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of BrowserGym agents and Cua, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cua leads on trust — 100.0/100 (Grade A) vs 40.5/100 (Grade D), a 59.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal BrowserGym agentsServiceNow/BrowserGym Cuatrycua/cua
HVTrust score 40.5 100.0
Evidence grade D A
Overall rank #122 #19
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #3 #1
GitHub stars 1.3k 19.4k
Last updated 110d ago 4d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
License NOASSERTION MIT
Downloads 7k/wk 11k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 7.5 6.9
Identity & provenance / 20 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 8.5 11.0
Maintenance / 20 4.7 19.7
Adoption / 20 12.6 15.7
Open in the live compare tool → BrowserGym agents profile Cua profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.0 →