BrowserGym agents
🌎💪 BrowserGym, a Gym environment for web task automation
Compare BrowserGym agents
How does it stack up against its Browser & Computer Use neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Is BrowserGym agents safe? BrowserGym agents scores 55.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #401 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-17. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Ranked neighbours in Browser & Computer Use
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions vs Browser & Computer Use
55.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceBrowserGym agents Browser & Computer Use average (41 agents)
Activity Inputs
49.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Is BrowserGym agents safe?
Does BrowserGym agents publish package provenance?
Does BrowserGym agents have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is BrowserGym agents actively maintained?
What license does BrowserGym agents use?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to BrowserGym agents's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain BrowserGym agents?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores BrowserGym agents from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/browsergym-agents)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/browsergym-agents"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/browsergym-agents.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Browser & Computer Use
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON