RegistryCompare › Browser Use vs Stagehand

Browser Use vs Stagehand

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Use and Stagehand, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Stagehand leads on trust — 84.9/100 (Grade A) vs 74.5/100 (Grade B), a 10.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use Stagehandbrowserbase/stagehand
HVTrust score 74.5 84.9
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #92 #49
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #6 #4
GitHub stars 108.3k 23.8k
Last updated 2d ago today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10 5.0 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 13.3M/wk 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.0 18.8
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.8 12.8
Maintenance / 20 19.9 17.8
Adoption / 20 20.0 18.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Declared
External providers 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … 7 — Anthropic, Browserbase, DeepSeek, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Use profile Stagehand profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →