RegistryCompare › Browser Use vs OpenCLI

Browser Use vs OpenCLI

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Use and OpenCLI, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Use leads on trust — 73.6/100 (Grade B) vs 63.6/100 (Grade C), a 10.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use OpenCLIjackwener/OpenCLI
HVTrust score 73.6 63.6
Evidence grade B C
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #86 #174
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #6 #8
GitHub stars 107.9k 27.7k
Last updated today 5d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10 5.2 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 13.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.8 11.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.8 12.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.3
Adoption / 20 20.0 10.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Browserbase, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Use profile OpenCLI profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →