RegistryCompare › Browser Use vs OpenCLI

Browser Use vs OpenCLI

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Use and OpenCLI, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Use leads on trust — 72.5/100 (Grade B) vs 64.4/100 (Grade C), a 8.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use OpenCLIjackwener/OpenCLI
HVTrust score 72.5 64.4
Evidence grade B C
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #282 #482
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #12 #15
GitHub stars 115.2k 29.4k
Last updated today 19d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 5.1 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 1.7M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 8.2 11.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.5 12.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.7
Adoption / 20 20.0 10.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Use profile OpenCLI profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →