RegistryCompare › Browser Use vs Obscura

Browser Use vs Obscura

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Use and Obscura, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Use leads on trust — 73.3/100 (Grade B) vs 67.3/100 (Grade B), a 6.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use Obscurah4ckf0r0day/obscura
HVTrust score 73.3 67.3
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #244 #364
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #11 #13
GitHub stars 113.2k 26.5k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10 6.1 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 1.7M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 8.8 10.3
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.8 13.7
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 20.0 10.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Use profile Obscura profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →