RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs BrowserOS

Browser Harness vs BrowserOS

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and BrowserOS, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 90.8/100 (Grade A) vs 65.7/100 (Grade B), a 25.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness BrowserOSbrowseros-ai/BrowserOS
HVTrust score 90.8 65.7
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #9 #435
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #14
GitHub stars 17.5k 13.7k
Last updated 1d ago 2d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10 4.8 / 10
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Downloads 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.3 10.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.8 12.6
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 18.3 9.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — Amazon Bedrock
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile BrowserOS profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →