Browser Harness vs Browser Use
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Browser Use, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Browser Harness leads on trust — 87.7/100 (Grade A) vs 74.2/100 (Grade B), a 13.5-point gap. Note: Browser Harness's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness | Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 87.7 | 74.2 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #25 | #102 |
| Rank in Browser & Computer Use | #1 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 16.7k | 109.2k |
| Last updated | 11d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.1 / 10 | 4.9 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 3.0M/wk | 14.9M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 17.1 | 9.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.7 | 12.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.4 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.8 | 20.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
Browser Harness profile
Browser Use profile
More Browser & Computer Use →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →