Registry › Compare › Bright Data MCP vs Notion MCP Server

Bright Data MCP vs Notion MCP Server

Both are Grade A and 0.2 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Bright Data MCP leads on maintenance; Notion MCP Server leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A Bright Data MCP 80.7

A powerful Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides an all-in-one solution for public web access.

brightdata/brightdata-mcp · #162 overall · #78 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Bright Data MCP if maintenance matters most.

+6.5Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 5d ago

A Notion MCP Server 80.5

Official Notion MCP Server

makenotion/notion-mcp-server · #167 overall · #82 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Notion MCP Server if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+2.9Safety / Integrity: 55% of recent commits signed, against 18%
+2.4Adoption: 322.4k weekly downloads against 15.7k
+0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 4.5 against 3.7

Where they differ

13.0

Safety / IntegrityNotion MCP Server +2.9

15.9

11.6

TransparencyNotion MCP Server +0.7

12.3

19.6

MaintenanceBright Data MCP +6.5

13.1

13.8

AdoptionNotion MCP Server +2.4

16.2

+4.7

Runtime calibrationNotion MCP Server +0.3

+5.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Bright Data MCP and Notion MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Bright Data MCPbrightdata/brightdata-mcp	Notion MCP Servermakenotion/notion-mcp-server
HVTrust score	80.7	80.5
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#162	#167
Rank in MCP Servers	#78	#82
GitHub stars	2.7k	4.7k
Last updated	1d ago	5d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	3.7 / 10	4.5 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	16k/wk	322k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.0	15.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	11.6	12.3
Maintenance / 20	19.6	13.1
Adoption / 20	13.8	16.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Bright Data MCP profile Notion MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →