RegistryCompare › Bright Data MCP vs Notion MCP Server

Bright Data MCP vs Notion MCP Server

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Bright Data MCP and Notion MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Notion MCP Server leads on trust — 81.9/100 (Grade A) vs 75.9/100 (Grade B), a 6.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Bright Data MCPbrightdata/brightdata-mcp Notion MCP Servermakenotion/notion-mcp-server
HVTrust score 75.9 81.9
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #73 #55
Rank in MCP Servers #8 #7
GitHub stars 2.6k 4.6k
Last updated 8d ago 10d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10 4.8 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 8k/wk 147k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.6 16.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 11.7 12.6
Maintenance / 20 14.6 13.7
Adoption / 20 13.3 15.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface marketplace plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Bright Data MCP profile Notion MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →