RegistryCompare › Apify MCP Server vs Mobile MCP

Apify MCP Server vs Mobile MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and Mobile MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Mobile MCP leads on trust — 92.4/100 (Grade A) vs 88.6/100 (Grade A), a 3.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server Mobile MCPmobile-next/mobile-mcp
HVTrust score 88.6 92.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #28 #3
Rank in MCP Servers #5 #1
GitHub stars 7.0k 6.7k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 7.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 25k/wk 23k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.4 22.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.2 15.0
Maintenance / 20 19.5 19.2
Adoption / 20 15.1 15.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Apify MCP Server profile Mobile MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →