Apify MCP Server vs CloakBrowser MCP
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and CloakBrowser MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Apify MCP Server leads on trust — 86.8/100 (Grade A) vs 81.7/100 (Grade A), a 5.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server | CloakBrowser MCPswimmwatch/cloakbrowser-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 86.8 | 81.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #31 | #66 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #3 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 3.3k | 37 |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 2d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.0 / 10 | 6.9 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 18k/wk | 405/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.8 | 19.3 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.8 | 14.4 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.8 | 17.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 14.1 | 7.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | extensions | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
Apify MCP Server profile
CloakBrowser MCP profile
More MCP Servers →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →